Why hide them? It's good to get a sense connected with who's on the board and the rationality they're on it. If you have stats, why hide them? What is the point connected with all these statistics on the occasion that tribe are going to have on dig them up?
I don't show the harm in showing the stats. That's the more important stuff. Points are really just about who gets on the most. I limited integer the down votes I get, also I'm customary 4th place! One can conclude such I inspire on a lot. Not that I represent vile posts. ..
Show them!
You can see the stats calmly satisfactory via pressing the 'show' button. I agree among Loudacris - it saves space.
It in reality doesn't save that much space though, in my impression I would sooner not enjoy to rivet forth that little bit connected with essay of clicking show anyway. Especially since the breadth saved in reality isn't such great.
It is easier to read the list of top-scorers without enjoy to prospect through all those ofttimes unnecessary statistics.
I like the stats hidden by default because it preserves "white space" that makes the people page appear less chaotic and easier to consume. After all, if you pauperism on see the stats, you don't enjoy on "dig them up" just click over the impression stats hitch on also they appear eventually externally a foliate refresh.
I'm down with minimalism. I'm not sure though, because I'm not too interested in the leaderboard or stats so on the occasion that I am there to see everything it's just a superficial inquiry into who's up there and who's not, and on the occasion that I pauperism and information I bottle easily find it.So for me it looks/works good.
Yes, this makes perfect sense. The only problems we enjoy among Medicare also Social Security are the control taking money exhausted connected with the particular
systems in reverse screwing with their financing customary some other way. I would pay 30% and then cost until it inspire on it's feet financially. Hell, I am probably paying such now!Yes, Medicare needs fixed. There is to boot much help connected with the system and, frankly, the structure has been corrupted. But our current option is for lucre Health Insurance companies. Look at what they enjoy done just from the chance that the etiquette will change. They are raising rates equally fast as they can, and sometimes faster then the amerceable allows. They are out to get as much as they can for equally long equally they can. Costs will only essay up. We wish a fitly working public option externally a profit motive.
OOPS! I did this grievance via submitting a comment. I don't want my vote on exclude more before long already so I am hitch on my additional comment on the first comment and put ones finger on bifid of these precise for also precise against on trim out(couldn't cipher how on delete)
OOPS! I go for it the indicated grievance by submitting a comment. I don't pauperism my vote to exclude more then once so I am adding my added comment to the first criticism and placing two connected with these one for also one against on trim out(couldn't figure how on delete)
No, Medicare is a great idea, passing over when the structure is integrated through private enterprise and public support, waste, fraud and help ensues where estimations were equally breadth as $47 billion customary 2009. [1]In order to remedy innocuous care, reform duty be either limited government meaning no medicare, medicaid or any governmental support and more individual choice or all government support incorporate state hospitals, clinics, doctors, nurses also etc or otherwise celebrated as National Health Care.
I don't know on the occasion that it works but I like the picture. I think it's worth a 1,000 words ;)
No comments:
Post a Comment